IIS 4
A small oversight. Do the following:
- cd \winnt\system32\inetsrv
- regsvr32 logui.ocx
You get this when trying to create a cgi-bin, because there's already one
there. So you need to get rid of the old one, which IIS won't let you do.
I haven't done this myself, but apparently you need to remove the
execute permissions from the existing cgi-bin directory first, before
you can remove it.
Another approach has been to remove and reinstall IIS, making
sure no FrontPage elements were installed. This is probably a
little drastic, though.
Apparently, not a lot. It seems that they're the same thing, except that PWS is just
the web services, while IIS4 brings along the NNTP, SMTP, FTP, etc.
Yep. I've heard that installing PWS as a network service, instead of
using the PWS Install option from the Option Pack, and then installing
the ActiveState distribution, has worked. So it's possible.
Personally, when I was using W95, I used Apache instead of PWS...
This is apparently addressed in the release notes for NT 4 Options Pack:
"When installing IIS 4.0 on a computer running Windows NT Server, the NetLogon
and Computer Browser services must be running. If these services are not
running, you will receive a dialog that says "Cannot detect OS type" and Setup
will fail. "
And you need NT4.0 with Service Pack 3.
Dunno, to be honest. The reason for this is that I'm not the only person
dealing with my IIS installation, so I'm not at liberty to install whatever
I want. So, while I know that there is a set of patches for IIS4,
I haven't installed them. Part of the reason for this is that when I looked,
I couldn't find a clear list of what they changed/fixed. I'm from a UNIX
background, where the wisdom is, "if it doesn't fix a problem you've
got, don't install it.". Just applying patches because they're there
doesn't sit well with me.
The same applies to Y2K fixes, which happen to need SP4. Well, sorry, but
I'm not the NT administrator for the machines in question either, so there's
no way I'm going to install SP4 on a major server just because IIS4 isn't
rated as Y2K-compliant without it...
All this is a long-winded way of saying, if anyone has any experience,
good or bad, about IIS versions after Option Pack 4, I'd like to hear
about it.
Steve Kilbane.
Whitecrow home.